Shopper marketers across CPG share common horror stories about the pains of budgeting, managing, reconciling and reporting on their programs.
Too time consuming.
Too manual.
Too siloed.
Too complicated.
As a shopper marketer experiencing these pains, the natural action is to look for a solution to help simplify the processes, communication and reporting resulting in greater efficiency and effectiveness of your shopper marketing programs.
But when you start to look…
“Can’t our TPM system do that?”
I must admit that I am guilty of daydreaming of the time when shopper marketing activities are planned in conjunction with Trade in one system, and as one cohesive process. I used to be jealous of my sales team who effortlessly pivoted their TPM data and quickly reported their plans to management. Being armed with only a bunch of messy spreadsheets, I felt unprepared and disorganized compared to them.
After starting Shopperations and talking with dozens of shopper marketers, trade promotion managers, and providers of TPM systems, it all became clear: marketing planning and trade spend planning are very different, to a point where a system built for one purpose can hardly accommodate the other.
The truth is that the push that you may be getting from your IT or Finance to fold Shopper Marketing into your TPM is not because it can solve your problems, but theirs.
While on the surface level, the needs seem similar (plan, budget, reconcile, report), the reality is this thinking is like saying that driving a semi and a Ferrari are the same because they both have a steering wheel, GPS system, front windshield and brakes.
Shopper marketing already sits in the shadow of trade in many organizations. Integrating into a TPM solution buries shopper marketing even further making it seem like a trade tactic rather than a strategic driver.
Other departments have been tasked with simplifying the technology portfolio both in cost and in capability by eliminating redundancy.
It is your job to convince them that not all “marketing” operates the same and that their efforts to simplify will cost them more time and money in the long run.
Here are questions your organization needs to answer before trying to use TPM to manage your shopper marketing programs.
1. CAN A TPM HANDLE THE COMPLEXITY OF SHOPPER MARKETING TACTICS?
Trade promotion managers have just a couple of key levers to pull: Feature, Display, F&D or Temporary Price Reduction (TPR).
Marketers, on the other hand, have several major spend types, such as search, national media, retail media, coupon redemption and non-working dollars. Each of these types has a myriad of sub-types, or tactics, that must be further broken down and documented granularly for proper financial reporting. For instance, media can be bought on TV, radio, in print, digitally and in-store. Some shopper marketing tactics have shopper incentives, such as digital or print coupons, others - don’t.
The tactic proliferation is becoming even more of an issue due to recent pandemic-induced mad dash toward e-commerce, and also because of new ways now available to reach shoppers, such as voice activated smart speakers or augmented reality apps, seem to pop up every day.
Keeping track of all of these scenarios in a rigid TPM system is literally impossible.
2. HOW WILL TPM DEAL WITH THE VARIETY SHOPPER MARKETER VENDORS?
While TPM systems are concerned with managing customer trade allowances and processing deductions, shopper marketers deal with a myriad of third-party vendors.
The way that the shopper marketing media is bought and delivered is all over the place. We see marketers buy media directly from the vendors, through their shopper marketing Agency of Record, via a specialized media agency, or via a retail partner as part of a co-marketing program.
It’s not just that there are a lot of third-party vendors that shopper marketers have to manage, their number grows every year. Based on our experience with Shopperations clients, an average shopper marketing team deals with more than 50 vendors each year, and this number keeps going up. Some vendors bill via a PO process, others magically bypass it. Some send invoices for each program, others bill monthly. Managing shopper marketing vendors and their bills is a beast, and can be a full time job in itself.
No TPM system is adequately prepared for this vendor complexity, and why should they? They weren’t built for that.
3. CAN TPM ACCOUNT FOR SHOPPER MARKETING’S LONG PLANNING AND EXECUTION HORIZONS?
Shopper marketers often plan a full year of activities to enable strategic sell-in process. This means that TPM cost centers must be open and available for them before the fiscal year starts.
Advanced planning is also important because vendor deadlines for some traditional tactics like TV, print, and in-store media are quite long. For instance, to buy in-store shelf banners or coupon machines, you need to place orders months in advance.
When it comes to reconciling and actualizing spend, trade and shopper marketing also behave quite differently. TPM systems accommodate well for off-invoice allowances and scan-down accruals that come in pretty quickly, but that’s not how Shopper Marketing works.
Many shopper marketing programs, tactics and coupon offers span more than one period, or even multiple quarters, making it extremely hard to predict and close every month. Forcing TPM processes on Shopper Marketing would cause too much user churn and result in inaccurate actual spend and activity timing data to be used for post-promotional analysis.
4. CAN TPM HANDLE SHIFTING OF FUNDS BETWEEN PROGRAMS, PERIODS, QUARTERS, AND BUDGET TYPES?
The purpose of a TPM system is to manage trade budgets in an agile and efficient way. Therefore, any unspent funds are typically swiped in the end of the period or each quarter to strategically re-invest or drop into bottom line. TPM discipline and regular reconciliation are key to a successful TPM execution.
This sort of “use it or lose it” mentality is simply impractical, even dangerous for the shopper marketing function. Shopper marketers need the ability to shift funds between periods and quarters to uphold JBP and other partner commitments, continue to invest in equity-building initiatives despite the ever-changing retail calendars.
Marketing as a discipline is a series of experiments, they must be able to adjust based on results, learnings and market place situation. Things change, ebb & flow, opportunities to move things between periods and quarters are abundant. Not being able to make program and budget adjustments on the fly throughout the year, or being forced to give up unspent dollars each period will be akin to tying your marketers’ hands behind their backs.
5. CAN TPM PLAN BEYOND THE ADWEEK?
TPM systems plan on adweek basis, or in extreme scenarios on an even higher, monthly or period basis. This won’t work for shopper marketing planning. What is more meaningful to you:
That you had Mother’s Day Demos in Period 5
OR
That you had Mother’s Day Demos on May 11th through 12th?
How important is it for you to document the digital coupon “live dates” and the expiration dates for your coupon offers?
How important is it for your team to be able to create a detailed shopper marketing calendar?
If you say it’s important, then TPM is not a solution for your shopper marketing team. Even if they are using TPM to report and plan today, they are missing out on a lot of important details and are likely using multiple shadow spreadsheet systems to capture them.
WHAT SHOULD YOU DO INSTEAD
So, if TPM is not the answer, what alternatives exist to help shopper marketers get organized, more productive and more accountable? How can shopper marketing and Sales teams get aligned and plan collaboratively if TPM is off limits for shopper marketers?
These are the questions that kept us awake for many nights. Here are the suggestions that what we came up with as a result of our industry research and through our own, often painful, journeys:
BEWARE THE “WE CAN HANDLE SHOPPER” TPM VENDOR
Many TPM vendors are positioning themselves to be able to “handle” shopper marketing without understanding the technical aspects of shopper marketing operations. This makes it more attractive when purchasing a new TPM system, but can create a bigger nightmare for shopper marketers.
Need help making your case for why TPM is not a good fit for your shopper marketing programs? We can help you evaluate your current technology stack, build the financial and capability case for change, and discuss how to integrate a shopper marketing solution into your TPM to meet the needs of IT and your department.
Schedule your business case consultation today!